Descrição
This study approach the phenomenon of discursive inter-incomprehension. Our goal is to observe the interaction that occurs between discourses polemics in the discursive field of deafness, which constituted a discursive space delimited by two distinct positions on deafness: Audism Based Discourse and Deaf Based Discourse. Analyses indicate that the first one will be by means of anticipation - and denial - of what could be his simulacrum to the second one. The DFS will be defined precisely from what it is not, in order to build an "I" from the denial of a "non-self."KEYWORDS: Discourse. Deaf. Simulacrum. Polemical discourse.||Este estudo aborda o fenômeno da interincompreensão discursiva e objetiva analisar a interação que se estabelece entre discursos polêmicos no campo discursivo da surdez, onde delimitamos um espaço discursivo constituído por dois posicionamentos distintos sobre a surdez: o Discurso de Fundamentação Surda e o Discurso de Fundamentação Ouvintista. As análises indicam que o primeiro discurso constitui-se por meio da antecipação – e da negação – do que poderia ser o seu simulacro, aos olhos do discurso segundo, e que se define justamente a partir do que ele não é, de forma a construir um “eu” a partir da negação de um “não-eu”.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Discurso. Surdos. Simulacro. Polêmica discursiva.
ABSTRACTThis study approach the phenomenon of discursive inter-incomprehension. Our goal is to observe the interaction that occurs between discourses polemics in the discursive field of deafness, which constituted a discursive space delimited by two distinct positions on deafness: Audism Based Discourse and Deaf Based Discourse. Analyses indicate that the first one will be by means of anticipation - and denial - of what could be his simulacrum to the second one. The DFS will be defined precisely from what it is not, in order to build an "I" from the denial of a "non-self."KEYWORDS: Discourse. Deaf. Simulacrum. Polemical discourse.