• Transcultural Dialogue||Diálogos Transculturais

  • Voltar

Metadados

Descrição

Transcultural Dialogue builds relationships, which becomes the content for a community to create collaborative art based on the group’s dialogue. As an art education professor in the United States, I began facilitating Transcultural Dialogues in 2007 with students and colleagues at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda, and at the University of Helsinki. In this chapter, I present theories, concepts, strategies, and examples of Transcultural Dialogue concerning contemporary visual culture, cultural practices in relation to particular places, and a pedagogy designed to erode assumptions, ignorance, and misunderstandings. Pedagogical strategies of Transcultural Dialogue consider positionality, subjectivity, situated knowledge, transformative learning, intra-action, speculative standpoint, and diffractive methodology. The dialogic process elicits micro-cultural views that are specific and unique (i.e., they sustain difference), yet are shared within or part of macro-cultural knowledge. The act of meaning-making from micro-cultural practices can sustain as well as change the macro-cultural beliefs. Transcultural Dialogue is conversational performative cultural critique, collaborative artmaking, and commentary surrounding artworks by those involved in Transcultural Dialogue[1]. I have developed Transcultural Dialogue as a process that exposes systemic and environmental conditions, and approaches creativity as a social process.[1]    This chapter is developed from my 2017 InSEA keynote as published in the InSEA 2017 proceedings and several publications (KABIITO, LIAO, MOTTER & KEIFER-BOYD, 2014; KEIFER-BOYD, 2012, 2016; PAATELA-NIEMINEN & KEIFER-BOYD, 2015) in which I, along with co-facilitators, reflected on our process in order to improve future Transcultural Dialogue projects and to study educational impacts in relationship to pedagogical goals.||Diálogo Transcultural constrói relacionamentos, que se transforma em conteúdo para uma comunidade criar arte colaborativa com base no diálogo do grupo. Como professora de arte-educação nos Estados Unidos, comecei a facilitar Diálogos Transculturais em 2007 com alunos e colegas na Makerere Universidade em Kampala, Uganda, e na Universidade de Helsinki. Neste texto apresento teorias, conceitos, estratégias e exemplos de Diálogo Transcultural sobre cultura visual contemporânea, práticas culturais em relação a lugares particulares e uma pedagogia projetada para corroer suposições, ignorância e mal-entendidos. As estratégias pedagógicas do Diálogo Transcultural consideram posicionalidade, subjetividade, conhecimento situado, aprendizagem transformadora, intra-ação, ponto de vista especulativo, e metodologia difrativa. O processo dialógico elicita visões microculturais que são específicas e únicas, mas são compartilhadas dentro ou através do conhecimento macro-cultural. O ato de construção de significado das práticas microculturais pode sustentar bem como mudar as crenças macro-culturais. Diálogo Transcultural é crítica cultural performativa, arte colaborativa e comentário sobre obras de arte por aqueles envolvidos no Diálogo Transcultural. Desenvolvi Diálogo Transcultural como um processo que expõe condições sistêmicas e ambientais, e aborda a criatividade como um processo social.

ISSN

2357-9854

Periódico

REVISTA GEARTE

Autor

Keifer-Boyd, Karen

Data

30 de dezembro de 2018

Identificador

https://seer.ufrgs.br/gearte/article/view/89347 | 10.22456/2357-9854.89347

Idioma

eng

Relação

https://seer.ufrgs.br/gearte/article/view/89347/51627 | /*ref*/ALCOFF, Linda. Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, v.13, n. 3, p. 405-436, 1988. | /*ref*/ARROYO, Jossiana. Transculturation, syncretism, and hybridity. In: MARTÍNEZ-SAN MIGUEL,Yolanda; SIFUENTES-JÁUREGUI, B. & BELAUSTEGUIGOITIA, Marisa. (Eds.), Critical terms in Caribbean and Latin American thought: New directions in Latin American cultures. 2016.New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 133-144. | /*ref*/BARAD, Karen. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books. 2007. | /*ref*/CRANTON, Patricia & KUCUKAYDIN, Ilhan. Critically questioning the discourse of transformative learning theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(1), 43-56. 2012. | /*ref*/DENZIN, Norman. K., & LINCOLN, Yvona. S. Introduction: Critical methodologies and indigenous inquiry. In DENZIN, Norman. K., & LINCOLN, Yvona. S. & TUHIWAI, Linda Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. (ix-xii). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 2008. | /*ref*/HOGGAN, Chad.Transformative learning through conceptual metaphors: Simile, metaphor, and analogy as levers for learning. Adult Learning, vol.25 nº4, p. 134-141. 2014. | /*ref*/KABIITO, Richard; LIAO, Christine; MOTTER, Jennifer & KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Transcultural dialogue mashup. The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 6. Retrieved from http://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/transcultural-dialogue-mashup/ . 2014. | /*ref*/KEATING, Ana Louise. Teaching transformation: Transcultural classroom dialogues. New York: NY: Palgrave/Macmillan. 2007. | /*ref*/KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Transcultural dialogue. Keynote at the International Society for Education through Art (InSEA) World Congress, Daegu, S. Korea. 2017. | /*ref*/KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. FemTechNet distributed open collaborative course: Performing dialogue, exquisite engendering, and feminist mapping. In: SHIN, R. (Ed.), Convergence of contemporary art, visual culture, and global civic engagement. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 2016. | /*ref*/KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Building Transcultural Dialogue: Global Perspectives in Teaching. Global Penn State: Internationalizing the Curriculum conference. University Park, PA. September 28. 2013a. | /*ref*/KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Building Transcultural Dialogue; Building Participation; Building Capacities for Translate-abilities, Response-abilities, Sense-abilities. National Ziegfeld Award Acceptance Speech. National Art Education Association Conference. Fort Worth, Texas. March. 2013b. | /*ref*/KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Feminist Web 2.0 pedagogy: Collaborations that sustain difference. In C. Bitzer, S. Collingwood, A. E. Quintana & C. J. Smith (Eds.), Feminist Cyberspaces: Pedagogies in Transition (pp. 251-272). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars. 2012. | /*ref*/KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Tagging Transcultural Dialogues on the Human-Technology Collaborations panel at the MobilityShifts conference held at the New School in New York City. October 15. 2011a. | /*ref*/KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Transcultural Dialogues: Gender and ICTs in Ugandan Contexts. Presented in the course, IST 297C: Gender and the Global Information Technology Sector at Penn State. April. 2011b. | /*ref*/KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Critical Participatory Action Research Activism: US and Ugandan Transcultural Dialogues about Contemporary Visual Culture. Sixth International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry 2010 at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. May. 2010. | /*ref*/KNIGHT, Wanda B., & DENG, Yang. N/either here n/or there: Culture, location, positionality, and art education. Visual Arts Research, 42( 2), 105-111. 2016. | /*ref*/NAPLES, Nancy A. Feminism and method: Ethnography, discourse analysis, and activist research. New York City, NY: Routledge. 2003. | /*ref*/PAATELA-NIEMINEN, Martina., & KEIFER-BOYD, Karen. Transcultural intra-action. In M. Kallio-Tavin & J. Pullinen (Eds.), Conversations on Finnish Art Education (pp. 304-317). Helsinki: School of Arts, Design and Architecture Aalto ARTS books. 2015. | /*ref*/PRITCHARD, Helen, & PROPHET, Jane. Diffractive art practices: Computation and the messy entanglements between mainstream contemporary art, and new media art. Artnodes, 15, 5-14. Retrieved from http://artnodes.uoc.edu . 2015. | /*ref*/SANTÍ, Enrico Mario. Fernando Ortiz: Counterpoint and transculturation. In Ciphers of history: New directions in Latino American cultures (pp. 169-281). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 2005. | /*ref*/VAN DER TUIN, Iris. ‘‘A different starting point, a different metaphysics’’: Reading Bergson and Barad diffractively. Hypatia 26(1), 22-42. 2011. | /*ref*/WALDRON, Rupert. Positionality and reflexive interaction: A critical internationalist cultural studies approach to intercultural collaboration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 12-19. 2017.

Direitos autorais

Direitos autorais 2018 Revista GEARTE | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Fonte

Revista GEARTE; v. 5, n. 3 (2018): Diálogos entre o Ensino de Artes Visuais no Brasil e em outros contextos | Revista GEARTE; v. 5, n. 3 (2018): Diálogos entre o Ensino de Artes Visuais no Brasil e em outros contextos | 2357-9854

Assuntos

Aprendizagem Transformadora. Conhecimento Situado. Cultura Visual. | Transformative Learning. Situated Knowledge. Visual Culture.

Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Continue navegando